Die Wurzeln der Fotografiegeschichte liegen weiter zurück, als wir annehmen: Bereits im 4. Jahrhundert vor Christus beschrieb Aristoteles die Camera Obscura. Hierbei wird ein Bild in das Innere der Lochkamera projiziert. Durch eine kleine Öffnung sieht man die auf dem Kopf stehende Projektion der Außenwelt. Die Camera Obscura gilt als Urstein fotografischer Verfahren – sie ebnete den Weg für weitere revolutionäre Erfindungen.
Wer erfand die Fotografie?
Joseph Nicéphore Niépce (auch Nièpce oder Niepce) und Louis Daguerre gelten als die Erfinder der Fotografie:
1826 gelang es JosephNicéphore Niépce, das erste beständige Bild aufzunehmen. Dafür belichtete er eine mit Asphalt beschichtete Zinnplatte – und das 8 Stunden lang! Nièpce wählte ein naheliegendes Motiv: den Ausblick aus seinem Arbeitszimmer im französischen Saint-Loup-de-Varennes.
Der Maler Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre war so begeistert von der Errungenschaft, dass er Nièpces Partner wurde. Er tüftelte weiter an der Technik und entwickelte ein Verfahren mit Kupferplatten und Quecksilberdämpfen, welches eine deutlich kürzere Belichtungszeit ermöglichte.
Damit fand Daguerre 1839 mit der nach ihm benannten Daguerreotypie einen Weg, Fotografie erstmals kommerziell für Portraits zu nutzen. Hier begann die bahnbrechende Erfolgsgeschichte der Fotografie.
William Henry Fox Talbot entwickelte wenige Jahre später das Negativ-Positiv-Verfahren. Mit seiner Hilfe konnten Fotografen nun ihre Bilder durch Negativabzüge vervielfältigen.
Fotografie Geschichte damals wie heute: Selfies und „sex sells“
Bevor Fotografie zur eigenständigen Kunstgattung aufstieg, dominierte insbesondere Malerei die Kunstszene. Noch im 19. und Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts wurden Fotografen von Künstlern als minderwertige Rivalen angesehen. Traditionell ließ man sich zu dieser Zeit von Malern porträtieren, die nun um ihre Daseinsberechtigung fürchteten. Dennoch integrierten die ersten Künstler Fotografie in ihren Arbeitsprozess.
Das erste “Selfie” der Geschichte nahm 1839 der amerikanische Lampenhersteller und Fotografie-Enthusiast Robert Cornelius auf: mit Hilfe der Daguerreotypie. Geschäftstüchtige Fotografen erkannten sofort den kommerziellen Mehrwert der Reproduzierbarkeit der Bilder.
Aktfotografen wie Alexis Gouin oder Bruno Braquehais produzierten in den 1850er Jahren mit ihren erotischen Darstellungen die Vorläufer klassischer Pin-up-Fotos. Diese fanden reißenden Absatz, was nicht verwunderlich ist: „Sex sells“ – daran hat sich auch heute nichts geändert. Nach wie vor gehören Aktbilder zum festen Repertoire vieler Fotografen, doch nur wenige finden den schmalen Grat zwischen Ästhetik und Erotik.
______________
Aber es ist alles nicht so eine simple story, wie man sie hier, im rebblogten Text und beigefügten Film(chen) darstellt, weil eben die Camera Obscura schon in der Antike bekannt war und den findigen und pfiffigen Künstler dies zu tun ermöglichte, was von der Welt als schier Unmögliches, ergo – Wunder, ergo – Schwarz Magie, klasifiziert wurde. Eine solche Geschichte erzählt ein deutscher Schriftsteller, Mathias Gatza in seinem faszinierendem Roman Der Augentäuscher (siehe oben). Ich werde Euch nicht erzählen, worum es in diesem Buch geht. Es ist so lustig, ironisch, gesellschaftskritisch und interessant, dass Ihr es einfach lesen musst.
I am a clown … and I collect moments. – Heinrich Böll, The Clown (1963)
The first thing I linger over, when I upturn the box onto my bedsheet, is an overexposed photograph of two skinny boys. It depicts me, aged 19, with a collegial arm slung over the shoulders of Ed, an old friend from school. The pair of us are crouched on a boulder on a beach in western Thailand, in the ungainly repose of people who have just hurried into position after setting a camera timer. The image is shot at an angle from below, and the purplish sky overhead prefigures a gathering storm. The rapturous look on my face suggests that I was either unbothered or that I hadn’t noticed. Whatever the case, I was having a good day.
The photo is one of a thousand odds and ends inside a box – specifically, a Reebok shoebox – that long ago became a reliquary for the stash of mementoes I brought home from my first independent trip abroad. It was the sort of journey that was a rite of passage for kids of a certain milieu at the turn of the 20th century, when Gap Year culture was the rage. I’m not sure what propelled me and the two friends I travelled with, beyond some vague cultural determinism; this was just what a lot of British teens did in the hiatus between school and university. Other than the starting point, Cairns, and the return flight from Bangkok, I had little idea of where we were going, or what we could expect to find when we got there.
When I arrived home – 30 pounds lighter, with a penchant for wearing baggy trousers emblazoned with a Chinese dragon, and no doubt insufferable – I transferred the trove of knick-knacks I’d accumulated in my rucksack into a plastic carrier bag from a Bangkok 7-Eleven. Then I crammed it into this shoebox and shoved it in the attic. It’s taken me 20 years to revisit the contents.
It’s anodyne stuff, mostly. There are a few banknotes and coins; street maps of obscure Vietnamese and Cambodian towns; a dozen flyers for backpackers’ bars. Emptied onto a bed, it looks like anyone else’s trash. But to me it memorialises a graduation. By the time I stashed away this box, I think I already knew that I had found an obsession, and a counteragent, potentially, for the fidgety discontent I’d carried through school.
Home, increasingly, had begun to feel like a malaise; away seemed like an instant antidote. It was the escape hatch I’d been searching for.
Sitting at a desk in London 20 years on, those rudderless months in Australia and Southeast Asia belong to an expired world.
I guess it was inevitable, as the pandemic dragged on, that many of us would be plunged into nostalgia for the journeys we took in the past. For while it may be glib to bemoan a lack of adventure in a period of global bereavement and anxiety, the drastic contraction of international movement is likely to be one of COVID-19’s most momentous cultural and economic ramifications. The old way it was practised, at vast scale, and across increasingly porous borders, has begun to look like it might be a terminal casualty. At the time of writing, there are only memories, and the work of reorienting ourselves to a more inert and less hospitable world.
The author in Chilean Patagonia in 2004
I began travelling independently with that trip in 2000, and in the period since I’ve travelled a lot, certainly more than is usual. In hindsight, the best word to describe my compulsion to move isn’t wanderlust but dromomania, because the second word better hints at its obsessive dimensions. It wouldn’t be unfair to think of it as an addiction. A consuming fixation, unthinkable for the vast span of human history, that even today, after months of immobility, I struggle to imagine living without.
Recalling those travels now, it is tempting to view them as having straddled travel’s golden age. In the first 20 years of the millennium, international tourism arrivals more than doubled, from 700 million in 2000 to almost 1.5 billion in 2019. Over that period, travel, for those of us lucky enough to enjoy it, has become synonymous with wellbeing, a vital adjunct of a fulfilling life.
As I determined to write an elegy to this era, however, I was surprised to find myself feeling not just nostalgia but also ambivalence – at once reeling from the cessation of global travel and quietly resigned to the idea that the breakneck experientialism of the pre-COVID world had to be derailed. Why, for me and others, did the desire to experience other places – to feel the joy animating my face in that old photo – evolve into such a burning need? Was there more at play than simply the decadent joy-seeking of a generation who could? Or was it merely a selfish moment in time, one that we now see, in the stark light of a pandemic’s recalibration of our priorities, for the indulgence it always was?
It seems hard to credit, in a society so utterly reconfigured by the digital revolution that was to come, but, for curious kids growing up in the late 1980s and early ’90s, the world still seemed a depthless prospect. Borders were impermeable; the nations they concealed were incomprehensibly varied and vast. It was a world that could only be glimpsed and never surveyed, in which encyclopaedias and atlases hinted at a planet still rife with mystery.
In elementary school, my favourite books were the Adventure series by Willard Price. Published between 1949 and 1980, the 14 slim novels followed the exploits of two brothers, Hal and Roger Hunt, as they travelled the globe collecting rare animals for their father’s Long Island zoo.
Hal, the elder, was the archetypal travelling hero: 17 years old, adept, absurdly brave, ‘as tall and strong as his father’. But I identified more with the younger brother, Roger, who was eager, but green and accident-prone. The stories were surreal in their eventfulness, each chapter opening on another shoot-out or dangerous animal encounter, as the boys careened from one escapade to the next. In Amazon Adventure (1949), the first book in the series, shy and rare jungle creatures – tapirs, anacondas, jaguars – materialise at their feet each time they step ashore. Together, the boys wrestle this temperamental fauna into submission and stuff it aboard a boat they anoint The Ark, upon which they drift down South America’s great river, pursued all the while by the bullets and arrows of psychopathic rivals and head-hunting ‘Indians’.
Reading it back now, it’s tempting to laugh at the narrative’s unlikelihood. We can only wonder at the rationale of the boys’ father, John Hunt, a man of presumably lunatic irresponsibility and questionable ethics, as he dispatches two teenage sons to pilfer endangered species from the four corners of the world.
However, for all their far-fetched plotlines, it occurs to me in hindsight that the books encapsulated much about the life that I, a fatherless kid, easily bored, would grow to covet. The cinematic, event-filled life. The mythic, shadow father. Hal, the surrogate, surmounting every challenge. The boy, feigning courage. It was a pulp fiction allegory for my state of mind. On page 84 of Amazon Adventure: ‘The truth is the kid was scared to death.’
For the time being, my own adventures, and indeed the mainstreaming of adventurous travel, were far in the future. During childhood, I went overseas a handful of times. But we never left Europe, and whatever happiness I found in those trips was transitory, overshadowed as they often were by my mum’s melancholy. It was on such occasions, when convention ordained that life should be at its most pleasurable, that she most felt her solitude. More often, we camped in Devon, or stayed in Welsh caravan parks. And I cajoled my mum into letting me bring friends along, so that we could spend the week sneaking off to smoke cigarettes and weed, and persuading sympathetic hippies to buy us flagons of potent West Country cider.
The truth was that foreign travel as it would grow to be enjoyed was yet to make its full debut. My parents’ generation had Interrailed around Europe. Since the early 1960s, when the first charter flights unlocked the Mediterranean’s mass tourism market, a growing cohort of British holidaymakers had started to venture south for an annual summer vacation. The bourgeoisie had discovered the joys of Alpine skiing. But as far as most Brits were concerned, the far-off places beyond western Europe could stay that way. The geopolitical volatility of the late Cold War, which presented the countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America as theatres of conflict, famine and totalitarianism, didn’t suit the brochures.
Bouncing from bus to border post, I felt restored because I also felt autonomous
Nevertheless, the seeds of my own itinerancy were germinating. It’s interesting to note that, in the argot of the time, a compulsion to travel was often described in chronic terms. A person who loved to go overseas was said to have contracted ‘the travel bug’. A person stuck at home, dreaming of foreign climes, had ‘itchy feet’. What would, within two short decades, grow into a universal pursuit was once analogous to a fungal infection. In my case, the allusion would be fitting, because my compulsion to travel was forged in pathology, even if, in the euphoria of my earliest journeys, I was enjoying myself too much to notice.
Long before it appeared in passport stamps, my itch manifested in a maudlin temper, and a deep-seated dissatisfaction with life at home. In my teenage years, I often found myself gripped by a crushing cynicism that seemed all the more unshakeable as the 21st century arrived with its oil wars, dumb politics and global warming. I had a beatnik disdain for the status quo and often felt stifled by its orthodoxies. Why aim for Oxbridge, start a pension, consider a long-term career path? In some inchoate way, I was convinced I would never harvest the spoils.
Initially, these nihilistic tendencies manifested in typical adolescent misbehaviour, in petty crime, and bongs, and street-corner booze. However, arguably the most peculiar symptom, and perhaps its most consequential, was what I can only describe as an allergy to the familiar, a reluctance to retrace intellectual or physical ground I’d covered before. Anything that was reminiscent of chapters I had already closed – driving past my old school, for instance, or bumping into an old acquaintance I’d once called a friend – made me feel stuck and panicky. After university, as I fell sideways into temporary office jobs of limited utility, sliding my knees under a desk felt like an act of submission. For a spell, walking down to the shops from my mum’s house became a source of despair.
One unfortunate offshoot of this unease was that I often felt ill. All manner of psychosomatic symptoms – that is, the physical presentation of psychological pain – afflicted me throughout my 20s. I’d already become prone to exaggerating the severity of bugs and viruses, wallowing in hypochondriac self-pity with the onset of whatever small malady. But now even minor health complaints would transmute into blue-light medical emergencies: each headache, a brain tumour; each off-colour piss, a harbinger of diabetes; each aching limb, the leading edge of some autoimmune degeneration. Still other ailments were entirely imagined.
The link between emotional anxiety and physical wellbeing was often embarrassingly explicit. I was once working in an office where a colleague related a weekend horror story about her boyfriend having to rush to Accident and Emergency with an ‘impacted testicle’. Two days later, I limped pathetically into the doctor’s office, pleading for someone to investigate an imaginary pang in my own bollock, thinking all the while that I was losing my mind.
It sounds absurdly self-aggrandising to speculate that a few months in Southeast Asia might have presented itself as a cure for this emotional maelstrom. All I can tell you is that, on the move, miraculously, the aches and anxieties would disappear.
Bouncing from bus to border post, I felt restored because I also felt autonomous. The enemy was futility, and my vulnerability was tied to it epidemiologically, like vector and disease. Only by going away, and in so doing defying society’s stifling expectations, could I evade the predestiny clawing at my back. Immobility was a capitulation, a figurative death. So I sought to be untethered.
At home, now, as I pick through the relics of that first, naive journey at the turn of the millennium, each item triggers floods of reminiscence. There’s a cut-out scrawl of a dolphin, drawn by my six-year-old sister, which she handed to me bawling as I shouldered my backpack to leave. A piece of plastic brake handle, which snapped off a hired moped when I lost control of it in a Malaysian alleyway. A page on ‘post-holiday blues’, rudely torn from a discarded Lonely Planet guidebook, which I read in a Khao San Road flophouse on the day we flew home: ‘Life on the road is challenging, exciting and fulfilling while life back home can appear bleak, boring and dreadfully lacking in meaning…’
In many ways, I had stumbled into the arena of international travel at a pivotal moment, just as the New Age backpacker culture that had lured hippies east on a cloud of mysticism and hashish smoke was being fully co-opted by the mainstream.
To be continued in one week
***
Henry Wismayer is a writer based in London. His essays and features have appeared a.o. in The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, The Washington Post Magazine, The Guardian and The Wall Street Journal.
Tekst Anny Alboth z Guardiana (patrz link powyżej) został przetłumaczony na polski przez Jacka Pałasińskiego i opublikowany na Drugim Obiegu, jego codziennych facebookowych doniesieniach na temat polityki polskiej i światowej. Doniesienia te są wspaniałym dziełem; reblogowałam tu już kilka z nich i zachęcam wszystkich do podjęcia próby zaprzyjaźnienia się z panem Jackiem na Facebooku, po to, żeby móc prawie codziennie czytać rzetelną “prasówkę”, pełną faktów nieznanych szerszemu ogółowi i wspaniałych, ciętych, a zarazem pełnych najgłębszej empatii komentarzy.
Piszę, “spróbujcie się zaprzyjaźnić”, bo możliwe, że się to nie uda. Jacek Pałasiński ma 4999 przyjaciół na Facebooku i wygląda mi to na liczbę nieprzekraczalną.
Wesołych świąt, moi mili, nie zapomnijmy postawić na stole pustego talerza dla bezdomnego, chorego i głodnego uciekiniera, bo może uda mu się do nas dotrzeć. Pan Jacek też o to prosi, choć brzmi w tej prośbie inny ton niż w tym, co ja tu napisałam, choć słowa są te same. Zresztą sami zobaczcie.
Anna Alboth with refugees in Narewka, Poland, near the Belarus border. ‘We cannot take people with us or drive them to a safe place. That would be a criminal act.’ Photograph: Jana Cavojska/SOPA/Rex/Shutterstock
Jacek Pałasiński, Drugi Obieg, Facebook, czwartek, 16 grudnia 2021
„Guardian” publikuje dramatyczny artykuł Anny Alboth, wolontariuszki z Grupy Praw Mniejszości. Przeczytajcie!
Anna Alboth
W mojej głowie ciągle trwa myśl: „Mam w domu dzieci, nie mogę iść do więzienia, nie mogę iść do więzienia”. Polityka jest poza moim zasięgiem i poza zasięgiem ofiar na granicy polsko-białoruskiej. To ironia losu, że na tej granicy zgromadziło się ponad 50 ekip medialnych, ale Polska jest jedynym miejscem w UE, gdzie dziennikarze nie mogą swobodnie relacjonować. Tymczasem zbliża się sroga północnoeuropejska zima, a moje palce marzną w ciemne, śnieżne noce. Sytuacja graniczna pokazuje przepaść między tym, co legalne, a tym, co moralne. Przebija wysiłki tych, którzy działają na rzecz ratowania życia. Jedyne, co możemy zrobić my, aktywiści w lasach na granicy polsko-białoruskiej, to zanieść wodę, żywność i ubrania zdesperowanym ludziom. Jednak wykonanie tego podstawowego aktu humanitarnego wymaga ukrycia. Musimy się ukrywać i przekradać przez lasy. Zwrócenie uwagi straży granicznej, policji czy wojska wymusiłoby kolejne przegnanie. Wśród drzew spotkałam różne grupy: rodziny, matki z dziećmi, ojców z niepełnosprawnymi dziećmi, osoby starsze i osoby z najsłabszych mniejszości świata – etnicznych, religijnych i LGBTQ+. Szukali wolności, ale od sierpnia są wypychani na Białoruś 5, 10, a nawet 15 razy. Na nocne spacery mam na sobie duży plecak pełen termosów z ciepłą zupą, skarpetek, butów, kurtek, rękawiczek, szalików, czapek, plastrów, lekarstw i powerbanków. Chodzę w ciemności i chowam się za drzewami, gdy słyszę helikoptery lub widzę reflektory policji. Słyszę plusk zupy w pojemnikach na plecach, słyszę mój oddech – nikt nie nauczył mnie skradania się i niewidzialności, jak zawodowego żołnierza. Od lat zajmuję się prawami człowieka, odwiedziłam większość granic UE i obozy dla uchodźców, ale nigdy nie bałam się, że podczas poruszania się trzeszczą gałązki pod moimi stopami ani tym, że szeleszczą drzewa nad moją głową. Z osobistych historii i dowodów zebranych przez Minority Rights Group International wraz z kolegami z Grupy Granica, sojuszu 14 polskich organizacji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego reagującego na kryzys, wiemy, że co najmniej 5000 osób było w lasach i że obecnie jest tam co najmniej 1000. Jesteśmy w kontakcie ze wszystkimi: zdesperowanymi ofiarami obrzydliwej gry o władzę między państwami. Za każdym razem, gdy odpowiadamy na telefon od kogoś w potrzebie, jego matki wciąż w Iraku lub Afganistanie, albo kuzyna z Berlina, zabieramy plecaki na ramiona i ruszamy. Dzień i noc – długo po tym, jak świat stracił zainteresowanie. Czasami szukamy ludzi godzinami. Czasem, ze względów bezpieczeństwa, wielokrotnie zmieniają miejsce pobytu. Czasem starsze babcie lub małe dzieci, które nie mają już sił na chodzenie, utknęły na polskich bagnach. Teraz, gdy lasy pokrywa śnieg, a ludzie nie mogą do nas dzwonić, bo ich telefony zostały zniszczone przez polską armię, używamy kamer termowizyjnych. Spotykamy przerażone oczy, wycieńczone twarze, ciała zniszczone zimnem, rozpaczliwie pozbawione odporności po tygodniach spędzonych w lodowatym, wilgotnym lesie. Zamarznięci, spragnieni, głodni ludzie. Nie miałam pojęcia, co oznacza głód. Dawałam kawałek czekolady moim dzieciom, kiedy narzekały przed obiadem. Czytałam statystyki ubóstwa i podręczniki do historii. Nic nie wiedziałem o głodzie. Ludzie na granicy polsko-białoruskiej nie jedli od tygodni. Co kilka dni, po gwałtownym odepchnięciu ich od zasieków z drutu kolczastego, mogą dostać starego ziemniaka od białoruskiego żołnierza, jeśli mają pieniądze. Podzielą się tym z dziećmi. Od wielu dni nie mają nic do picia. Albo piją wodę bagienną lub deszczową, która powoduje skurcze żołądka i ogłuszający ból głowy, jeszcze bardziej ich osłabiając. Pozostawienie im wystarczającej ilości jedzenia i wody na kilka dni jest niemożliwe: nikt nie ma siły, by tyle dźwigać. Nie możemy zabrać ze sobą ludzi ani odwieźć ich w bezpieczne miejsce. To byłby czyn przestępczy. Ale pozostawienie tych ludzi na pastwę powolnej śmierci nie jest przestępstwem. Gdzie jest Czerwony Krzyż, Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych ds. Migracji i agencja ONZ ds. uchodźców? Te organizacje, które działają nawet w strefach wojennych? Czyż zabiera się żywność i wodę najbardziej niebezpiecznym przestępcom? Czy 5-letnia Elina jest bardziej niebezpieczna, kiedy jest mniej godna? Ma epilepsję, ale nie ma lekarstwa. Spotkałam ją w lesie z dziewięcioma innymi Kurdami, wszyscy bez butów. Przetrwali wojny i naloty w ojczyźnie, ale mogą zamarznąć na śmierć w polskim lesie. Podczas każdego odepchnięcia polscy i białoruscy oficerowie zabierają im wszystko: pieniądze, ubrania i obuwie. Jesteśmy w kontakcie. Jeśli uda im się ukryć swoje telefony, możemy się komunikować. Dzielą się zdjęciami i filmami białoruskich psów. Pokazują mi kąsane rany, jeśli spotkamy się po polskiej stronie. Płaczą. Proszą o radę. Nie chcą opowiadać swoim rodzinom o swojej trudnej sytuacji, ale potrzebują kogoś, z kim mogą porozmawiać. „Piąty push-back. Przy szóstym się zabiję”. „Straciłem syna, ma astmę. [Ostatni raz, kiedy dzwonił to [było] trzy dni temu. Wiesz gdzie on jest?” “Kiedy przyjdziesz? Czy masz wodę? Nawet kroplę?” Poddani kampanii dezinformacyjnej uchodźcy otrzymują sprzeczne doniesienia służb białoruskich, które rozpowszechniają formularze o osiedleniu się w Polsce lub Niemczech. Budzi to nadzieje na bezpieczną podróż. Ale prawdziwym celem jest rozbicie ich na polskiej granicy, aby wywierać presję na UE. Niektóre niepokojące doniesienia sugerują, że migranci są zmuszani do udziału w przemocy w ramach białoruskich prób prowokowania polskich funkcjonariuszy. Ryzykując eskalację przemocy, my, aktywiści w lasach, pragniemy przypomnieć światu, że uchodźcy nie są agresorami. Są zakładnikami reżimu Łukaszenki, który wykorzystuje ich do swoich celów. Polacy przysyłają mi wiadomości: „Gdzie mam wysłać ciepłe i ciemne ubrania?” „Jaka jest sytuacja na granicy? Media pokazują nam tylko filmy autorstwa polskiego ministerstwa lub władz białoruskich”. „Płaczę, kiedy kładę dzieci do snu. Proszę, napisz coś, co może pomóc”. Dunja Mijatović, komisarz Rady Europy ds. praw człowieka, spędziła cztery dni w Polsce i przyjechała z nami w teren. Powiedziała: „Największą siłą ruchu pomocy uchodźcom i uchodźcom z pogranicza polsko-białoruskiego są mieszkańcy okolicznych miejscowości – w strefie zagrożenia i przy niej. To ich współczucie i empatia przedłuża życie ludzi w lesie. Ich odwaga i bezinteresowność. Ich dobro ratuje życie”. Oczywiście inni widzą to inaczej: ludzie pomagający na granicy to „wrogowie narodu”, „agenci Łukaszenki”, „winni niszczenia wartości europejskich”, „ci, którzy zapraszają tu terrorystów”. Jesteśmy winni, że spragnionym zostawiamy w lesie bukłaki z wodą. Jesteśmy winni dzielenia się zupą. Wkładania butów na zmarznięte stopy, które nie mogły się już ruszyć. Jeśli pomaganie jest nielegalne, czy w ogóle rozumiemy, czym jest przestępstwo”?
*** Cóż może dodać autor Drugiego Obiegu, piszący o sobie D.O.?
Wesołych świąt Bożego Narodzenia, klerze! Wesołych świąt, katolicy! Spokojnych i radosnych świąt, bardzo religijne sfery partyjno-państwowe! Pogodnych, rodzinnych świąt Polacy! Nie zapomnijcie o dodatkowym talerzu na wigilijnym stole!
***
Przypominam:
Tu można wpłacać pieniądze, które naprawdę dotrą do tych, niosących pomoc tam na granicy: Grupa Granica.
Wpłacajcie! Do zakończenia aktualnej zbiórki zostało jeszcze 7 dni! To dzięki naszym wpłatom osoby w terenie, ale też prawnicy, psycholodzy i cała armia dobrych ludzi może robić to, co robi. Dziękuję: https://zrzutka.pl/8br4cy
KÖNIG GALERIE presents MACHINE HALLUCINATIONS: NATURE DREAMS, Refik Anadol’s second large-scale solo exhibition in Germany. Almost two years after his site-specific installation LATENT BEING, the artist returns to Berlin to reveal the aesthetic outcomes of his research into the intersection of human consciousness, archives of nature, and machine intelligence.
MACHINE HALLUCINATIONS: NATURE DREAMS, designed specifically for KÖNIG GALERIE, comprises three novel aesthetic approaches to a vast photographic dataset of nature: A giant data sculpture displaying machine-generated, dynamic pigments of nature titled NATURE DREAMS, four new series of data paintings, and WINDS OF BERLIN, a site-specific, public art projection on the tower of ST. AGNES which will be created based on environmental real-time data collected from the city.
Anadol is a pioneer in the world of rare digital art and crypto collectibles, minting the first fully immersive digital artwork NFT in September 2021. For KÖNIG GALERIE he creates unique NFT options: the AI data sculpture NATURE DREAMS, and his public projection, WINDS OF BERLIN, which will mark the first time a generative public artwork in Berlin to be offered in NFT form.
An architectural exhibition of synesthetic reality experiments based on GAN algorithms developed by artificial intelligence and inspired by fluid dynamics, NATURE DREAMS turns datasets into latent multi-sensory experiences to commemorate the beauty of the earth we share.
“I am very excited to be back in Berlin to transform the façade of the iconic ST. AGNES church into a data sculpture and showcase our most cutting-edge AI data paintings from the MACHINE HALLUCINATION series. Our studio’s exploration of digital pigmentation and light through fluid solver algorithms draws inspiration from nature-themed datasets, using the most innovative methods available to AI-based media artists.
Refik Anadol
MACHINE HALLUCINATIONS is an ongoing exploration of data aesthetics based on collective visual memories of space, nature, and urban environments. Since the inception of the project during his 2016 during Google AMI Residency, Anadol has been utilizing machine intelligence as a collaborator to human consciousness, specifically DCGAN, PGAN and StyleGAN algorithms trained on these vast datasets to reveal unrecognized layers of our external realities.
Anadol and his team collect data from digital archives and publicly available resources, then process the millions of photographic memories with machine learning classification models. The sorted image datasets are then clustered into thematic categories to better understand the semantic context of the data universe. This expanding data universe not only represents the interpolation of data as synthesis, but also becomes a latent cosmos in which hallucinative potential is the main channel of artistic creativity. As a thoroughly curated multi-channel experience, MACHINE HALLUCINATIONS offers a new form of sensational autonomy via cybernetic serendipity.
Refik Anadol is a media artist and pioneer in the aesthetics of machine intelligence, and the director of Refik Anadol Studio in Los Angeles. Since 2008, his works have explored the space among digital and physical entities by creating a symbiotic relationship between architecture, science, technology, and media arts. As an artist and a spatial thinker, he addresses the challenges, and the possibilities, that ubiquitous computing has imposed on humanity, and what it means to be a human in the age of AI.
Coining the terms “data painting” and “latent cinema”, Anadol has invited his audience to imagine alternative and dynamic realities by re-defining the functionalities of both interior and exterior architectural elements. He tackles this by moving beyond the integration of media into built forms and translating the logic of a new media technology into spatial design. Anadol’s site-specific three-dimensional data sculptures, liveaudio/visual performances, and immersive installations take many virtual and physical forms. Entire buildings come to life, floors, walls, and ceilings disappear into infinity, vivid aesthetics take shape from large swaths of data, and what was once invisible to the human eye becomes visible.
Foto Ela Kargol 25.11.2021 at 18:00
REFIK ANADOL STUDIO consists of artists, architects, data scientists, and researchers from diverse professional and personal backgrounds, embracing principles of inclusion and equity throughout every stage of production. While the studio is located in Los Angeles, its members originate from 10 different countries and are collectively fluent in 14 languages. Since 2014, REFIK ANADOL STUDIO’s site-specific public art projects comprised vast and multidimensional urban typologies, inspiring participation, interaction, and appreciation of art in diverse communities around the world. The members share Anadol’s vision of blurring the boundaries between art, science, and technology with a focus on creating new public spaces and screens by augmenting existing architectural elements and buildings facades.
Ela Kargol, Krystyna Koziewicz & Ewa Maria Slaska in front of church tower 25th of Nov 2021 at 18:00
BIO
Refik Anadol’s (b. 1985, Istanbul, Turkey) work has been shown worldwide in numerous institutional exhibitions including the Venice Architecture Biennale (2021); the National Gallery of Victoria 2020 Triennal, Melbourne (2020); MUTEK, Montreal (2020); Centre Pompidou, Paris (2020); National Museum of China, Beijing (2019); Fotografiska, Stockholm (2019); ZKM, Karlsruhe (2019, 2018); the Istanbul Biennal, Istanbul (2015); Marta Herford Museum, Herford (2010); the Contemporary Art Center – sentralistanbul, Istanbul (2008). Public audio-visual performances took place in locations throughout the world such as the Walt Disney Concert Hall, Los Angeles (2018, 2014); Ars Electronica, Linz (2017, 2011, 2010); the Arc de Triomf, Barcelona (2011); the European Capital of Culture, Essen (2010) and many others. The artist has been honoured with the Lorenzo il Magnifico Lifetime Achievement Award for New Media Art (2019); the German Design Award (2017); the Microsoft Research’s Best Vision Award (2013), amongst others.
Worldwide Screening: »The Dissident« von Bryan Fogel am 10. Dezember 2021
The international literature festival berlin [ilb] invites individuals, schools, universities, the media, and cultural institutions to participate in a Worldwide Screening of »The Dissident« by Bryan Fogel on 10 December 2021, the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the United Nations in Paris in 1948.
The documentary reconstructs the background of the murder of the Saudi Washington Post journalist and regime critic Jamal Khashoggi in 2018 and illuminates the geopolitical and power-strategic context of the case.
With the worldwide screening of Bryan Fogel’s film, we want to commemorate Jamal Khashoggi’s struggle for human rights and freedom of press and make sure that his commitment to an open, pluralistic Saudi Arabia is not forgotten.
With the film screening, we would also like to bring into focus the human rights violations in Saudi Arabia, especially the right to freedom of expression and freedom of the press. Saudi Arabia ranks fifth among countries that control the internet through spying techniques, censors and trolls. Dozens of journalists are currently imprisoned or beeing persecuted. Women and queer people who stand up for their rights are also imprisoned and tortured. In 2019, 184 people were executed in Saudi Arabia, more than ever before.
»The Dissident«: American documentary filmmaker and Academy Award winner Bryan Fogel spent two years researching for the film. The two-hour documentary analyses the course of events at the consulate in Istanbul and also sheds light on how those in power in Saudi Arabia suppress freedom of the press and manipulate public opinion with trolls and bots. Turkish investigators, journalists and opposition members in exile, Khashoggi’s fiancée Hatice Cengiz and the former CIA director John Brennan have their say.
Jamal Khashoggi (*1958 in Medina, Saudi Arabia) was the director of the Saudi daily newspaper Al-Watan. As of 2017, he was living in the USA. In his texts, he openly criticised the Saudi Arabian government and was a member of an oppositional Twitter network.
With the Worldwide Screening, the ilb continues the series of Worldwide Readings it has been organising since 2006 on various topics, mainly related to human rights, as well as the first two Worldwide Screenings from 2020.
We are calling for participation in the Worldwide Screening of »The Dissident«. This can be done privately in a cinema, in a cultural centre or theatre, a small circle or in a school. The film »The Dissident« is available as video on demand from various streaming providers in English and German and from August 2021 also as DVD in bookshops. Screening rights must be clarified individually with the distributor – we are happy to provide information about distributors.
Institutions and individuals who would like to participate with a screening on 10 December 2021 are asked to send us the following information by 15 November 2021: Organisers, venue, time, participating actors, event language, link to your website if applicable. The email address is: worldwidescreening@literaturfestival.com. The ilb will announce the events on the website and on social media.More
Weltweite Filmvorführung: »The Dissident« von Bryan Fogel Das internationale literaturfestival berlin (ilb) ruft Kinos, Schulen, Universitäten, Fernsehsender, Medien, kulturelle Institutionen und Individuen zu einer weltweiten Filmvorführung von »The Dissident« von Bryan Fogel am 10. Dezember 2021 auf, dem Jahrestag der durch die Vereinten Nationen im Jahr 1948 in Paris verkündeten Allgemeinen Erklärung der Menschenrechte.
Der Film rekonstruiert die Hintergründe der Ermordung des saudischen Washington Post Journalisten und Regimekritikers Jamal Khashoggi und beleuchtet die geopolitischen und machtstrategischen Zusammenhänge des Falls. Khashoggi wurde am 2. Oktober 2018 im saudischen Konsulat in Istanbul von einem 15-köpfigen saudischen Geheimdienstkommando getötet, als er dort Papiere für seine bevorstehende Hochzeit abholen wollte.Mit der weltweiten Vorführung des Films von Bryan Fogel erinnern wir an Jamal Khashoggis Kampf für Menschenreche und Pressefreiheit und möchten einen Beitrag dazu leisten, dass sein Einsatz für ein offenes, pluralistisches Saudi-Arabien nicht vergessen wird.
Mit der Filmvorführung wollen wir zudem die Menschenrechtsverletzungen in Saudi-Arabien, besonders das Recht auf Meinungs- und Pressefreiheit, in den Fokus rücken. Saudi-Arabien steht auf Platz fünf jener Länder, die mittels Spionagetechnik, Zensoren und Trollen das Internet kontrollieren. Dutzende Journalist*innen befinden sich aktuell in Gefangenschaft oder werden verfolgt. Auch Frauen und queere Personen, die sich für Ihre Rechte einsetzten, werden inhaftiert und gefoltert. 2019 wurden in Saudi-Arabien 184 Menschen hingerichtet, so viele wie nie zuvor.
»The Dissident«: Der amerikanische Dokumentarfilmer und Oscarpreisträger Bryan Fogel hat für den Film zwei Jahre recherchiert. Die zweistündige Dokumentation analysiert den Tathergang im Konsulat in Istanbul und beleuchtet daneben, wie Machthaber in Saudi-Arabien die Pressefreiheit unterdrücken und die öffentliche Meinung mit Trollen und Bots manipulieren. Zu Wort kommen türkische Ermittler*innen, Journalist*innen und Oppositionelle im Exil, die Verlobte Khashoggis Hatice Cengiz und auch der ehemalige CIA-Direktor John Brennan.
Jamal Khashoggi (*1958 in Medina, Saudi-Arabien) war Direktor der saudi-arabischen Tageszeitung Al-Watan. Ab 2017 lebte er in den USA. In seinen Texten kritisierte er offen die saudi-arabische Regierung und war Mitglied in einem oppositionellen Twitter-Netzwerk.
Das ilb knüpft mit dem Worldwide Screening an die Serie der weltweiten Lesungen an, die es seit 2006 zu verschiedenen Themen, vor allem auf Menschenrechte bezogen, veranstaltet sowie an die ersten beiden Worldwide Screenings aus dem Jahr 2020.Wir rufen zur Beteiligung an der weltweiten Filmvorführung von The Dissident auf. Dies kann privat in einem Kino, in einem Kulturzentrum oder Theater, einem kleinen Kreis oder in einer Schule erfolgen. Der Film »The Dissident« ist als Video on Demand bei verschiedenen Streaming-Anbietern auf Englisch und Deutsch und seit August 2021 auch als DVD im Buchhandel erhältlich. Die Vorführrechte sind individuell mit dem Verleih zu klären – gerne geben wir Auskunft über die Distributoren.
Institutionen und Personen, die sich mit einer Vorführung am 10. Dezember 2021 beteiligen möchten, werden gebeten, uns folgende Informationen bis zum 15. November 2021 zukommen zu lassen: Organisator*innen, Veranstaltungsort, Uhrzeit, teilnehmende Akteure, Veranstaltungssprache, ggf. Link zu Ihrer Webseite.
Die E-Mail-Adresse lautet: worldwidescreening@literaturfestival.com. Das ilb wird die Veranstaltungen auf der Webseite und in sozialen Medien ankündigen.Mehr
Art lovers get ready to be struck by Cupid’s arrow, as the first image of the completed restoration of Johannes Vermeer’s Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window (around 1657-59) has been released today by Dresden’s Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, fully revealing a hidden image of Cupid. The change to the composition in one of Vermeer’s most famous paintings is so great that the German museum is dubbing it a “new” Vermeer in publicity materials.
The painting has been in the museum’s collection for more than 250 years and the hidden Cupid had been known about since an x-ray in 1979 and infrared reflectography in 2009. It had been assumed that the artist himself had altered the composition by covering over the painting of Cupid.
But when a major restoration project began in May 2017, conservators discovered that the paint on the wall in the background of the painting, covering the naked Cupid, had in fact been added by another person. When layers of varnish from the 19th century began to be removed from the painting, the conservators discovered that the “solubility properties” of the paint in the central section of the wall were different to those elsewhere in the painting.
Following further investigations, including tests in an archaeometry laboratory, it was discovered that layers of binding agent and a layer of dirt existed between the image of Cupid and the overpainting. The conservators concluded that several decades would have passed between the completion of one layer and the addition of the next and therefore concluded that Vermeer could not have painted over the Cupid himself.
When the discovery was announced to the public in 2019, the senior conservator Uta Neidhardt said that it was “the most sensational experience of my career”. She added: “It makes it a different painting.”
The layer of overpaint was meticulously removed using a scalpel under a microscope, revealing the startlingly altered composition. The painting will go on show next month for the first time since the restoration as the star piece in a major exhibition titled Johannes Vermeer: On Reflection(10 September-2 January 2022) at the Gemäldegalerie in Dresden. The exhibition will include ten Vermeer paintings in total, making it one of the most significant shows on the Dutch Old Master in recent years (there are only around 35 extent Vermeer paintings).
Among the standout loans in the show are The Geographer (1669) from the Städel Museum in Frankfurt; View of Houses in Delft/The Little Street (around 1658) from the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam; and A Young Woman standing at a Virginal (around 1670-72) from the National Gallery in London, which has a similar painting of Cupid in the background.
Bitte beachten Sie die aktuellen Covid-19 Regelungen.
FHXB Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg Museum Adalbertstr. 95a 10999 Berlin fhxb-museum.de
In selbstverwalteten Initiativen drücken wir unsere Wünsche und Hoffnungen auf eine Stadt für alle aus. Fünf selbstorganisierte Projekte blicken zurück auf ihre bewegte, manchmal auch noch sehr junge, Geschichte, auf interne Konflikte und die gesellschaftlichen Kämpfe, in denen sie sich positionieren. Mit “Dann machen wir’s halt selbst” fragen wir in Form einer Ausstellung, wie in dieser ökonomisch unter Druck geratenen Stadt selbstorganisierte Räume politische Möglichkeiten offenhalten.
Projektgruppe “Dann machen wir’s halt selbst”: Heike Böziger, Barbara Bohl, Anke Peterssen, Hermann Schlegel, Andy Wolff, Christine Ziegler Kuratiert von: Inga Zimprich Websitegestaltung: Judith Fehlau Ausmalbilder von: Burcu Türker Ausstellungsdesign: Inga Zimprich
“Dann machen wir’s halt selbst” wird unterstützt von Stiftung Menschenwürde und Arbeitswelt, Senatsverwaltung für Kultur und Europa Berlin, Bezirk Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg.
****
We’ll do it ourselves, then
– 40 years of self-organised spaces in Berlin
With: Casa Kuà, HeileHaus, Kinderbauernhof am Mauerplatz, Regenbogenfabrik, Schokofabrik
FHXB Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg Museum Adalbertstr. 95a 10999 Berlin fhxb-museum.de
In taking part in self-organised projects, we express our wishes and our hopes for a city belonging to all. Here five self-managed projects look back on their eventful, sometimes still very young, histories, on internal conflicts, and on the social struggles in which they position themselves. With “We’ll do it ourselves, then” we ask, in the form of an exhibition, how self-organised spaces keep political possibilities alive in a city under huge economic pressure.
*****
Zróbmy to zatem sami
– 40 lat samorządnych przestrzeni w Berlinie
Pięć projektów: Casa Kuà, HeileHaus, Kinderbauernhof am Mauerplatz, Regenbogenfabrik, Schokofabrik
Otwarcie: 26 sierpnia o godzinie 19 Czas ekspozycji: 27 sierpnia – 12 grudnia 2021 Godziny zwiedzania: Wt – Czw, 12 – 18 / Pią – Nie, 10 – 20
Prosimy o przestrzeganie aktualnie obowiązujących przepisów Covid-19.
FHXB Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg Museum Adalbertstr. 95a 10999 Berlin fhxb-museum.de
Biorąc udział w samorządnych projektach, dawaliśmy wyraz naszym potrzebom i nadziejom, że nasze miasto należy do wszystkich. Pięć takich samozarządzających się projektów ocenia swoją pełną wydarzeń historię, niekiedy całkiem niedawną, w której pomiędzy konfliktem wewnątrz grupy, a walką o realizację celów społecznych, kształtuje się ich osobowość. Poprzez wystawę “Zróbmy to zatem sami” próbujemy zastanowić się nad pytaniem, jak samorządne zarządzanie przestrzenią może wspierać politykę komunalną w mieście w czasach silnych nacisków ekonomicznych.
Konrad found him and called him Don Quijote. His name is Reza, he is an Irani and lives in USA. He planned to walk thousand miles on the water from Miami to Bermuda. Walking on the water, like Jesus. Sometimes I think that this both figures are the same. Jesus Don Quixote. They stopped Reza’s adventure already two times, but I belive, it is not the end of the story. Just observe.
There is allmost no chance to get the ticket, but try. Just try. Try HERE.
It is fantastic. She get you in her crazy world and you remember that journey forever.
Below you see, what she made especially for her exhibition in Gropius House in Berlin.
All fotos made by Konrad.
The exhibition itself is the retrospective of all her famous or less famous works, starting with her drawings from the school time. You had never a possibility to see all these works together.
If you do not get the ticket, just enjoy these fotos.
The international literature festival berlin [ilb] calls on individuals, schools, universities, cultural institutions and media to participate in a Worldwide Reading for the Dead of the Corona Pandemic on September 5, 2021. The reading is intended to commemorate those who died in the pandemic. For more than a year, the world has been in the grip of the pandemic. Nearly three million people worldwide have died from Covid-19. Not a day goes by when we are not confronted with statistics and curves on current deaths and illnesses. Yet, it often remains abstract numbers.
The individual person and the individual stories behind them are hardly present in the public perception. Illness, death and grief have become largely invisible due to precautionary measures. Many people die alone, behind closed doors, and are buried in small circles. In many cases, there is no way for relatives and friends to say goodbye – and if they do, it is at a distance or in a digital setting.
Literature has the potential to give expression to this situation, to counter isolation at least through reception. It finds narratives away from the everyday images of horror, tells of loss from different perspectives, and helps to make the incomprehensible tangible, the intangible comprehensible. Readings can take place anywhere, including privately in a small circle, in a school, in a cultural institution or on the radio. People who would like to participate with a reading on September 5, 2021 are asked to send us the following information: Organizers, venue, time, participating actors, event language, link to your website if applicable.
The ilb has published first texts for the reading on the website, further are following soon in various languages. All readings will be announced there and on social media.
Weltweite Lesung für die Toten der Pandemie am 5. September 2021
Aufruf
Das internationale literaturfestival berlin [ilb] ruft Einzelpersonen, Schulen, Universitäten, Kultureinrichtungen und Medien dazu auf, sich am 5. September 2021 an einer Weltweiten Lesung für die Toten der Pandemie Corona zu beteiligen. Mit der Lesung soll an die Toten der Pandemie erinnert werden.
Seit mehr als einem Jahr wird die Welt von der Pandemie heimgesucht. Fast drei Millionen Menschen sind weltweit an Covid-19 gestorben. Kein Tag vergeht, an dem wir nicht mit Statistiken und Kurven über aktuelle Todesfälle und Krankheiten konfrontiert werden. Doch oft bleiben es abstrakte Zahlen. Der einzelne Mensch und die individuellen Geschichten dahinter sind in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung kaum präsent. Krankheit, Tod und Trauer sind durch Vorsichtsmaßnahmen weitgehend unsichtbar geworden. Viele Menschen sterben allein, hinter verschlossenen Türen, und werden im kleinen Kreis beerdigt. In vielen Fällen gibt es für Angehörige und Freunde keine Möglichkeit, sich zu verabschieden – und wenn doch, dann aus der Ferne oder in einem digitalen Umfeld.
Literatur hat das Potenzial, dieser Situation Ausdruck zu verleihen, der Isolation zumindest durch Rezeption entgegenzuwirken. Sie findet Erzählungen abseits der alltäglichen Schreckensbilder, erzählt vom Verlust aus verschiedenen Perspektiven und hilft, das Unfassbare greifbar zu machen.
Lesungen können überall stattfinden, auch privat im kleinen Kreis, in einer Schule, in einer Kultureinrichtung oder im Radio. Menschen und Institutionen, die sich mit einer Lesung am 5. September 2021 beteiligen möchten, werden gebeten, uns folgende Informationen zukommen zu lassen: Organisator*innen, Ort, Zeit, teilnehmende Akteure, Veranstaltungssprache, ggf. Link zu Ihrer Website.
Das ilb hat erste Texte für die Lesung auf der Website veröffentlicht, weitere folgen bald in verschiedenen Sprachen. Die Lesungen werden dort und in den sozialen Medien angekündigt.